Rascal -- Love ya. Hear! Hear!

Only because this is part of what I do for a living…

let David lead

privilege

haha!

wow .. Rascal . i was just rewatching this for the 10th time at least … and check in here before bed to findthat you have done it again.. put words in print that are in my heart… bravo

Rascal,
Divinely said.

Juliebug,
It surely must be an occupational hazard for now letting David near any material of original artists. As Ronald said -- He makes an aural feast of anything!

Good Night All

His spontaneous smiles in this are infectious. I find myself grinning and crying.
I saw the other video of this from a different view. You can see him playing and his hands look huge on those keys.
Just saying.

have only been able to skim the last three threads (I think its three) crazy fast commenting going on…. have still only seen the vids posted by rascal…

HG and kindredspirit- loved your posts back somewhere (can’t remember which thread!) LOL

Heartchuleta126- “Thought it might be time to join in on what seems to be a healthy mixture of cerebral pontificating, musical analysis and naughty fun…” ….that’s why I love it here…the people!

I love all the lurkers posting!

Kizzi,TOfan, refnaf, Hello Gorgeous, Bluebarsa,djb- thanks to the kind heart and generous spirit of ninaf I will be able to hitch a ride with her and join everyone in Albany!! I’m so excited!! thanks again nina! Kizzi- I emailed you.

Tess- Welcome friend. I am moved by your tragic events and inspired by your strength. I too am a recent widow, having lost my father-in-law, mother-in-law, my father, my husband, and just last week my dear friend all within too few a number of years. But, God has blessed me with 2 beautiful children and the Grace to see the beauty in life that surrounds me. David is part of that beauty and we are blessed to see it. Thank you for sharing your story.

The thought that crosses my mind is…..

When I saw the videos of WYSYLM from tour, I thought they were WONDERFUL…however, when I saw David perform live, his voice sounded (at least) twice as good as the video quality.

I imagine the same of this song and hope to see David perform it live….some day soon.

Kind of off topic but does anyone know where to find sheet music of the new CD? Dying to try out some of the songs…

“I’ve never felt so willing to let David lead me wherever he wants to go. And when an audience’s trust in an artist begins to reach that level, magic happens.”

I was interested in David’s comments on his latest blog:

“I was so nervous before the show, wondering what I was going to say on stage and how I was going to perform. It kind of just came out though, and the energy of the band and crowd was just such a great feeling.”

I see him as riding the energy of the band and crowd and even more important, trusting himself to let go and just let it come out. David is grounded in his mind and soul, he is becoming more and more centered in his body. He is without pretense. This clarity of mind allows him to surrender completely to the moment, to surrender to himself,, which releases a flow of energy between himself and the audience and allows us the intense pleasure of surrendering our hearts and minds to him. This indeed is the place, that blissful desert island, where magic can happen.

Slverfox!! Dang! If you hadn’t seen him before already, I’d be willing to wager you were just suffering from the beebee syndrome wherein it’s all over *poof!* too fast, and you’re stunned and gasping for more, MORE, MORE. But since you have live David performance consumption under your belt already… gosh. Don’t know what to say. I wonder if the missing something had anything to do with his being stranded without a functioning ear piece and left to sing “deaf.” (???)

Sweet dreams, SF.

ALTNOY Houston
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgBC1ixeO70

that set of videos is definitely of the *icky* quality genre… but… He was rockin’ hizself some ALTNOY there… jez sayin’.

Can’t wait for better vids.

I saw the (really bad quality) Crush vid. Looked like he was moving to me.

Dang it, how can it be past 11pm already. :/

Liz, and I was just kinda stunned… I had a feeling of disappointment that I quickly realized was simply my reaction to it all going *poof!* so fast! (clawing the air for replay button…lol) I hate the thought of SF being disappointed. Just hate it. But she’ll get a good night’s rest… and maybe have a chance to assimilate, synthesize… and catch some good vids, too. (I found the vids VERY good in the *re-living* dept.)

Janey, Yes, he was ON the moment he came on in Sacramento. I’m sure he was pumped for the first arena show of a series, and as you said, perhaps there was some magical alignment taking place!!

And beebee, I love your image of clawing for the replay button. “Noooo, it’s not over yet!!!” haha! I too needed the videos to help assimilate, it was just so intense in person.

I’m sure we’ll hear more from SF, hope she’s having sweet dreams.

hm… new silent night vid (up closer) … from snarkies

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RN8klfKtl8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z42qw9-srLc

From tree lighting interview -- includes uncut sound check of Angels and OHN at beginning.

Beat you JR. haha!

I was about to post the same video! That also has the interviews with him about it being unpredictable what happens when he comes onstage, and what he (doesn’t) want for Christmas…

the i know at #40 is for JulieBug!

My photos of David in Houston posted on Youtube..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8S-suKPfWw

Actually my sis took them, I just uploaded them and added music..he’s gorgeous, isn’t he?

I think I have to clarify my post about David’s performance last night…I was NOT disappointed in David, Never would I be disappointed in David. And He did move about the stage, but he didn’t “dance”, but that really doesn’t matter cuz his singing was beyond superb. and the audience loved him. It just wasn’t Like Sac. As for the earpiece..you never would have known from the way he sang..it was perfect. And his SILENT NIGHT was
glorius and Acapella Too! The other performers were no match for David’s vocals. I just wanted to make the point that to me it seemed like he was “restrained” somewhat, compared to Sac, not THE VOICE..but something else..and it bothered me. You all know how much David and his wellbeing and happiness means to me, so when I sense something is not quite right, I have to say something, but it may just be my imagination…
It’s 4 am, and I have to fly back in about 8 hrs..so I better get some sleep!

The video you posted, Rascal, is one I hadn’t seen. I have a hard time watching AND listening at once, on this one, because David is captivating both in voice and expression. Think I’m going to have to separate the two experiences to get the most out of each, because when I listen I miss a great smile for a fan, and when I catch the great smile for the fan I miss the beautiful vocal nuance.

Silverfox, it will be interesting to the best videos from last night. I think for those of us who follow David’s every performance, there are going to have to be some that are better than others. (But that every performance is going to be well worth the cost of the ticket, the travel and the time.) I imagine that David might have been chomping at the bit to perform live again, and that might have added energy to that first night.

And, too, I do wonder if sometimes he’s occasionally inhibited by an awareness of the intensity of his fans’ enjoyment of him. In particular, by a knowledge of some of the, erm, visual enjoyment of him. He may not read blogs, but his people do, and if they report back about certain, uh, tangents explored by the commentators of nearly every blog I’ve seen, he may reel back on certain dynamics. I’m not saying this is the case. I’m saying that if I were in his not-quite-eighteen-year-old-shoes, I may sometimes get a little weirded out and react accordingly. (Boy, Rascal — you are so much better at using that large vocabulary to say what you need to say with delicacy and precision.)

#45 Kait: I have been thinking about your post and I did have some of the same thoughts flit through my head when I read SF’s post right after the Houston JJ.

And, then I mulled over what I have read on the various blogs and I believe the performance changes at the Sacramento Jingle Ball was exactly what David needs. It cannot be the tiniest bit interpreted as over-the-top in any way what-so-ever; and to those of us who have memorized every nuance of every performance, it was breakout because he moved about the stage freely and danced a little and was so joyful.

Was it over-the-top when compared to other singers’ performances? No--if anything, by comparison, it was very tasteful.

I would speculate that we are just seeing someone in the process of learning new behaviors.

Here is a video of Works For Me from Houston. Sorry if it has already been posted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJ53bTKR0h4

Woah, Rascal! That young man is giving me fever! Thanks for that update with those pics! Don’t you just love how David is so damn sexy without even trying? *swoons.*

Rascal, I always lurk here but never have the courage to leave a comment, I guess all of you here says what I really feel and think of David, but when I saw the 2 pictures you just added on this thread, I can’t help but wonder why you never included this one?
http://david-hq.org/photos/displayimage.php?album=299&pos=18

“That is what makes a great star. When your average is still better than what most performers can ever do.”

Tess, that sums up David Archuleta in a nutshell.

SF, I know you weren’t and could never be disappointed in David. You just wanted more boogying and a Diva Hand or two. Seriously though, I was just thinking that this schedule must have been a bit grueling and he must might not have been ‘on’ the way he was in Sacramento. He stilll rocked the house.

“Goodness, the only reason people who look at a bed and immediately think of sex is that they haven’t done it on the couch, in the bathtub, or on the kitchen table. ”

I had to self edit my response to your quote Rascal. You are indeed a Rascal. I love it!

Oh, btw, I don’t think it’s innapropriate, or David would not have done it.

Tess, feel free to email me. I would love to chat with you and give you love and hugs and spiritual healing.
erinr.hernandez@gmail.com
or anyone else who would like to.

Morning! It’s still early here in Houston..hard to sleep when a person is coming down from the “high” after seeing David in person, in the flesh, but still feel like “is he real, or just a figment of my imagination?” You see him on stage and you want to gather in in your arms and protect him and at the same time know that if you even touch him, you would disappear. THE VOICE carries you to another demension, and it’s hard to describe. I’ve gone through this three times..this euphoria, then the sadness that overwhelms, The “feel like crying” cause even though you know there will be a next time, it won’t be soon enough! I want to go through “this” many, many times for the rest of my life, even though the after-affects for me are just like what I imagine a drug addict goes through in withdrawal!..haha!
Why do some of us feel like this, cuz I can’t be the only one, and others are just happy they saw & heard David and are completely satisfied..I can only say that it could be the age factor…

Kait #45..yes, Every performance by David is worth the trip and price of admission! Definitely!
The concern I have about “his people” causing David to feel “inhibited” and thus “turn down certain dynamics” is exactly what I hope doesn’t happen..But it probably does.
I hope he realizes that even though the “visual” aspect of David in Sacramento was unforgettable..It was the JOY with which he moved & danced around the stage freely as Kizzi said, that was a sight to behold and what we, his die-hard unconditional fans want to see..HIS JOY IS OUR JOY! Surely “his people” understand that. And you can’t hide David’s many attributes unless you put a monks cloak & hood on him..Good Grief! David is who he is, and the persona he projects on stage is just that,
a persona, it’s not gonna change his inner being. David should allow himself to go ahead and let his body “feel” the music like his heart & soul feels it! Do those hunkerdowns, strut your stuff, David..use the diva arm! Your joy is our joy!
MYYK.#60..it must be the camera..They did do a sound check..the sound was great..David’s voice was perfect!

The show last night also proved another point about David’s power..His was the only set without the use of special affects..Just David, THE VOICE, his band and a mic..and he was by far the best vocally and visually in my opinion.
BUT I am not a teen or twenty-something, do you all get my drift?

happy~#9~
so happy for you !! See you in Albany….!!

I love the photos. Of all the photos I’ve seen, these are my favorites. I like what this particular photographer captured. There is something about the lighting that compliments David very well.

Silverfox, #61. I can relate to the “coming down from the ‘high’” that you describe. I experienced it the other night after the tree lighting ceremony in LA.

Just speaking for myself here. To me, it feels like heartache, in a way. Have you ever felt so in love with someone that when you are apart your heart aches for them? That’s a little how it feels for me. To clarify . . . it isn’t that I ‘fell in love’ with David -- it’s that I ‘felt the love’ that he channels/elicits. I know he isn’t the source. To me, he is a catalyst that helps open hearts.

This heart opening is a very intoxicating feeling. For me, it’s just that it is difficult to sustain the full degree of expansion that takes place. So the inevitable contraction, in comparison, feels a little sad to me.

My one compensation is that I believe that each experience like this opens and stretches my heart a little more -- so that my ability to give and receive love is expanded as well.

Potent stuff.

On a more mundane level, I often experience a let down after some big event that I’ve been planning for and anticipating.

So, no, you aren’t the only one who feels the way you do.

Silverfox 43, maybe there was less dancing due to the fact that it was a Sunday performance. I’m basing this on my own childhood experiences growing up Baptist. On Sundays, my siblings and I weren’t allowed to dance or even listen to dance music.

THANKS everyone for “listening” to my rambles!
Gotta log off now..catching a plane home..

Peace & Love ( & goodwill To EVERYONE, not just men!! ) haha!

Later!

I’m so behind, miss you all! Beautiful post, Rascal, thanks again for creating this wonderful space — a real touchstone for all of us. Love you guys!

Happy #9, ((((hugs and more hugs)))), soooo glad you’re coming to Albany, hope it’s just the tonic you need. Can’t wait to meet you and tout le gang!!

Have only been able to skim the past two threads and just wanted to say to Kindredspirit (2 threads ago, yikes), thanks for sharing your experience. Your description had me in tears cause I felt much the same way at Ford Day but could not find the words to describe it. Intense love, spirit, rapture — still can’t do it — but will hold it dear till the end of my days.

And HG, “We are so blessed -- despite current economic woes and global insecurities -- to be living right now and experiencing the rise of a new kind of star.” Blessed indeed.

Happy#9, so glad you’re coming to the Albany show! Can’t wait to see the whole gang!

You know, Sagittarius, you are probably right on about the loss of his cellphone! And it wasn’t “just” a cellphone, it was an iPhone -- it probably has all his music on it which he probably plugs into while traveling on a plane, getting himself psyched up, etc. I’d be stressed if I lost my iPod -- even though all the music is on my laptop, still makes it difficult if you are used to having those white earbuds on your head whenever you want them. And for someone like David who is ALL ABOUT music -- ouch. I’m sure it was a huge frustration.

My thanks to Rascal and all the other wonderful writers on this blog. When I first heard and saw the video of David singing A Thousand Miles last year, I knew I was in for something. I had NO idea he would change my life. I started on a journey of finding any information about David Archuleta that I could. I have not looked back and very PROUDLY own my ODD! Hearing and seeing him sing this song now, has only cemented my appreciation for him and his brilliance. A true star!

HDD sales are in at 54% and David;s album sales is at 38k so he is on track for about 50k in sales this past week. AND on track for Gold around turn of the year. Those in the know say this is good!

kindredspirit #65: You are my soul mate! Your words made me cry in recognition. Your words speak SO clearly to my experience. Yes, it is heartache, an aching, a longing to be back in That Place, that place where David takes you, that place of love. And the experience is more intense when you see him in person, so the ache is stronger. Seeing him opens my heart and then I am left with this vulnerability, this emptiness when it is over. And to be clear, this is not a physical attraction (although he is, as ronaldsf puts it -- hawt), but rather a connection of hearts, of souls. When the connection is at its best, his music takes me to a place of profound peace and love and joy.

Since my encounter with David my one goal in life is to nurture that experience of connection in my daily life.

Joner, looks to me like he already LEARNED to think on his feet…lol. jez sayin’.

E-Online is giving David some major loving (“Angelic Voice”)!!

Wait for the video to load….him singing O Holy Night, GREAT sound and picture!!

http://www.eonline.com/videos/v37157_Raw__Archuleta_s_Angelic_Voice.html

SF #61 you wrote: “The concern I have about “his people” causing David to feel “inhibited” and thus “turn down certain dynamics” is exactly what I hope doesn’t happen..But it probably does.”

I want to preface what I am going to say by emphasizing that I know that everyone here loves David deeply and wants the best for him. I also know that we each come from a different background and perspective -- some of us are concerned that David comes from a conservative Mormon background and worry that that will inhibit his enjoyment of all of life -- specifically, the sexual/romantic part of his life -- and that those inihibitions with impact his peformances and career. And some of us come from David’s own background or at least a more conservative point of view and feel acutely uncomfortable with what we feel is inappropriate talk about his body. The bottom line is, we all love him (we love him “beyond reason”, as some of my friends like to say) and that we all want for him what SF says in her prayer every night. We start with that common ground.

But we do part ways along the road.

Here is the road I am going down. My concern is that his fans are sometimes blatantly disrespectful of him here at noting David. I know that other things go on in other places, and some of it is far worse than what goes on here. I guess that technically it is only PG-13 here when it is at its worst. And I know its all “in fun”, an intellectual exercise in innuendo. I am really good at seeing both sides of nearly every argument (which how I have come to be a faithful, practising Mormon who is also an advocate for gay rights.) But I have been thinking about this issue -- specifically what I (and others) feel is really disrespectful talk about David’s most private life and I can only see one side of it. I hate it and no part of me understands how it is okay to make crude jokes about David’s body.

I get that he is sexy (duh). And I think sexy is a wonderful, blessed, spiritual, joyful thing to be and to notice. But there is a continuum, in my mind, in regards to noticing and commenting about his sexiness. On one side are the people who are wigged out about David’s eyes looking provocative (and Rascal, I think I’m with you there). All the way over on the other side are the sites that veer toward porn (that I only know of through rumor). Between those two are gradations -- from healthy, adoring appreciation to smutty exploitation. For me, the comments about his body cross the line that divides appreciation from exploitation. Suggestions that he PURPOSELY chose to showcase his body for fan viewing pleasure in Sacramento is way over the line, disrespectful and, also, ludicrous. Because no one who suggests such a thing can say that they “know” David.

David equivocates about almost everything when he is interviewed -- he doesn’t want to hurt people’s feelings, he doesn’t want to say things he shouldn’t, and I think he wants to maintain some privacy. He waffles expertly. But he has never waffled about how he wants his fans to treat him, “I want to thank my fans for keeping it clean, ” he said once and, ” I want to thank my fans for respecting my standards.” He has talked about the standards he keeps for himself quite clearly. He doesn’t boast or push his beliefs in anyone else’s face. But he is clear. I think some people are concerned that it is LDS teachings that have created his “legendary modesty” but I would disagree because David takes those teachings and goes one step further -- no shorts, not taking off his shirt, being 18 and not having a make out song, are examples of his choices. It looks to me that David actually takes LDS teachings as his own because they fit his natural sensibilities, not that he has stuffed himself into someone else’s box. But regardless of why he has made the choices he’s made at this point in his life -- they are HIS choices. Maybe he will change his decisions someday, maybe he won’t. But he has the right.

So, do we trust him to make decisions about his own body or not? Do we second guess him and discount his personal standards? Some people are worried that at some point David will make decisions that will disappoint his conservative fans -- that those fans won’t respect David’s right to choose for himself as he grows older. But some of those same fans don’t allow him his choices right now. It’s HIS body -- even if he is a public person. Doesn’t he deserve our respect in this public place?

This is where I circle back to SF’s comment, quoted above. She is concerned that fan comments will make it back to the circle of people around David who will then try to convince him to tone down his natural exuberance. I suppose that might happen. But not only “David’s people” read these blogs. His siblings do, too. And his cousins. And his friends. To comment here so openly and then to assume that those comments will never make it to David’s attention is not realistic. Of course they know what goes on here. Of course those comments, those attitudes make their way to David.

I do know that everyone here loves him. I just think we should ask ourselves what it means to love him, what it means to support him, what it means to be an Original Fan.

On an entirely different topic -- the Italian version of AI is a hoot to watch. Listening to the dubbing in italian had me LOL. (I need to get a life!!)

I found it so funny, too, especially when Randy and Paula’s voices were dubbed! Sounds like David has a growing European fanbase and this will be great exposure.

Well, we’ll all take from smanda’s post what we’ll take from it, right? I’m one who worries about the public nature of any blog — and trying to define ‘the line’ for my own posts. Just having this discussion out there will help me remember to weigh words — and that’s a good thing, IMO.

I want to believe what Silverfox sensed was probably David’s tiredness.

I’m not that frequent a poster but I really enjoy the rapport in this blog, especially the shared joy of David’s accomplishments, as well as the constructive criticism and healthy sense of humour. Sorry, I don’t get the constant concerns about what David’s ‘people’ think of our comments. Isn’t ND a fansite? A tasteful one, for sure, but a fansite nonetheless. It’s not intended for his siblings or cousins to read. It makes me a bit uncomfortable when mature ladies go overboard with their appreciation of David’s physical attributes but I don’t feel like I’m entitled to pass judgement. I hope this doesn’t come across the wrong way -- having a different culture may hinder my understanding of attitudes that for me translate as excessive zeal.

I don’t want David to be tired. Let alone saddled with too many worries. Anyway, thanks for all the great links posted here today

Smanda#87, I really think this blog has been pretty respectful, even when there have been innuendo and the like. We’re all aware who David is and what he is about. These concerns pertaining to what’s “appropriate” or not in our discussion about David is not really about David, is it?

It’s about segments in David’s fanbase having a difference of opinion about how we talk about David. We can allude to David’s personal beliefs or even suggest that siblings and friends close to him are reading these public sites all we want, but is that really the issue here? Isn’t the mere mention of these factors designed to try to silence some of us here and try to “keep us in line” because some members of the fanbase are simply uncomfortable?

I think you have a right to state the ways in which some comments make you uncomfortable, but not everyone has the same level of discomfort. And the diversity of perspectives here is what has made this blog one of the most interesting, thought-provoking, and fascinating David sites out there.

# 97 HG

Hear, hear!

#87 Smanda, I really do understand all that you are saying, and yes I actually agree with you. I just don’t participate on some of the topics or direction that some of the discussion is going that’s all. I do know though, that David doesn’t look at this site and really this site is for the fans. If you’d like to email me I’d be happy to chat privatly with you. erinr.hernandez@gmail.com.
I’m also sure that there are alot of rumors and other things that are posted in the papers and tabloids that are worse at times. I may not agree with all that is said here at times, but I still think it’s a great site.

Ya’ know . . the funny thing about all of this is that most of us have no idea who all the other posters on this site are. Some of you have met, but has anyone met smanda? For all I know she might be one of David’s siblings, or best friends, or my next door neighbor. We are all entitled to our opinions, and I think it’s very important that we respect each other and try to not be judgemental -- on either side of the coin. I have noticed that there are a lot of mis-understandings about Mormons in general . . and maybe that’s why some have referred to them as “his people”. . . as tho’ they were a cult . . which they are not. But I know there are many faiths represented here, and all must be wonderful people because all love and appreciate David. I know he has changed many lives, and I am certain that brings him great joy.

Lord, Heavenly Father, please give me the patience and open heart to hear what my fellow Archies are saying tonight, because I’m being challenged right now. I’m feeling my patience getting thin about now, but please help me keep my temper. In short, please help me to be more like David…

Obviously, more work needs to be done on my part.

Here’s what I will say: David is a beautiful, beautiful human being. He is physically gorgeous! If people twice his age, around his age, younger, etc. comment on the sheer beauty of his eyes, lips, hands, thighs, shoulders, whatever, and most especially that phenomenal voice of his, why is this so inappropriate? I THANK GOD for such beauty and that we have a public figure to look up to.

Must any appreciation for a wonderfully formed young man always be viewed as inappropriate? If some of you are uncomfortable with such talk, there are others of us who are not comfortable with repression. I see no reason why those who are obviously having a lot of fun and who have reached a level of comfort with each other should now be expected to repress their feelings when much has been done to make this blog a very warm and welcoming space for David’s fans to share in our mutual love and appreciation for David.

*ends rant and probably needs to sign off right about now.*

Oops, mamasaun, we posted at the same time. I want to say that I think I was the first to use that term, “David’s people” and I merely mean those close to him who might read and bring news back to him. I was thinking of Dean and Richard and Brett and whoever might see. I don’t know which of those people are Mormon, and it’s none of my business.

One of my dearest wishes for David is that he always manages to blend that beautiful openness with his faith. It’s another area in which he has taught this ‘mom-age fan’ the way it can be done.

I’ve seen both Sacramento and Houston videos and to me, David performed in Houston with the same intensity and enthusiasm as in Sacramento. Yes, I agree that at the beginning of first song Touch My Hand, he seemed to be a bit serious, but that’s about it, the rest of the show, he was energetic, alive, intense, inspired, joyful , he walked and even jogged from side to side and he was even smiling and laughing at times. I think we fans are just giving to much meaning on something that is absolutely nothing to give meaning about. And about the shirt, why would we even wonder why he was wearing in Houston something that is longer at the front. For God’s sake, it’s a dress shirt and it’s the fashion, coming from a guy, sometimes I don’t like to tuck in myself. In Sacramento, he was wearing a long sleeves fitted t-shirt and naturally, it would be a little shorter at the front. Aren’t we thinking too much for absolutely nothing?

It’s like when he sang Imagine in AI where he didn’t sing the first 2 verses. People were speculating so many things like because of his faith and beliefs, blah, blah, blah. But later on, he proved us wrong, he sang all the entire verses. So please let’s not make things very complicated and avoid throwing meanings to utterly meaningless things.

Okay, first things first. I love and respect smanda immensely. I don’t think it amounts to telling stories out of school to reveal that she and I have conducted some very deep and heartfelt private correspondence about a range of issues related to a variety of topics around David and around LDS, and not always in relation to each other. I can attest to the fact that smanda is someone who values awareness, observation, and information more than myopic allegiance to some regimented proscriptions laid down for people who can’t or won’t think for themselves. And like smanda, I can see many sides of an issue.

On the one hand, notingDavid is a far, far safer place than almost any non-advocacy site that might talk about David. Just peruse the recent comments at Perez Hilton’s post of David’s “A Thousand Miles” performance if you want an example (or don’t — you’ll be offended to the bottom of your feet, I assure you). notingDavid is even considerably safer, as smanda acknowledged, than certain pro-David sites that think nothing of indulging in all manner of fantasy, vulgarity, and disrespect.

On the other hand, notingDavid is an independent publication, one that does not explicitly purport to represent, protect, or defend the interests of David Archuleta. Anyone who reads Rascal knows that acknowledgement of reality always trumps unjustifiable praise. Personally, I feel I accord Mr. Archuleta far more respect in that regard. notingDavid is also, it is important to note, a site that clearly and happily caters to intelligent adults, not swooning adolescents (okay, we allow ourselves an occasional swoon), who are, it must be emphasized, citizens of a country that values freedom of thought and speech above many other political principles.

If David or his people are going to wade in and observe the waters of public discourse, they had best be prepared to encounter all manner of nonsense, and make a decision to pick and choose what matters to them from what is being said and by whom. Otherwise, they should ignore it altogether. Although I will confess to having considered on more than a few occasions what the ramifications of certain expressions might be to David or his people, I have invariably concluded that it is more dangerous--and, indeed, less respectful--to temper my expression for that reason than to put something out there… especially something that is undoubtedly being addressed elsewhere, and in perhaps a much less considered and respectful fashion.

I fully respect and understand the concerns about objectification, even if I do not agree with them. Objectification is part of God’s plan for physical intimacy. We must necessarily be attracted, at some level, to physical beauty, and even to specific physical attributes. Problems emerge only when objectification happens at the exclusion of other human attributes or dimensions. I defy anyone to identify a single member of the notingDavid community who does not appreciate the artistic, spiritual, social, and professional aspects of David Archuleta in far more measure than they appreciate the size of his hands. Intelligent minds can hold hands and hearts in balance simultaneously.

If I had to put my own spin on smanda’s concerns, it would amount to something like, why is it necessary? And I get that, I really do. But I wind up at a metaphysical answer, which is that nothing is necessary. It may be for fun, for laughs (I confess to having had uproarious outbursts on a number of occasions); it may be because David’s effect on us is so sublime that it needs, on occasion, to be grounded in some kind of base humanity (there is nothing wrong with the lower chakras), or it may be because we simply love everything about him, including the things that he might find embarrassing or distasteful.

There are really only two points on which I take specific issue with smanda. The first is that the innuendos about David’s physical being have been crude. They have been nothing of the kind. smanda may disagree with me but I don’t happen to believe that topics themselves are crude, but only the way they are discussed. Crudeness is related to style, not substance. Indeed, I don’t know where I’ve seen more creative, sophisticated, hilarious writing apart from the glittering comedies of the 1930s, when nothing was said but everything was on the table.

The other point with which I take exception is that there was ever a suggestion that David purposely decided to showcase his physicality in some overt fashion. I never said that, I never even suggested it. What I said was that I had a feeling, a sense, nothing more, that David has been historically more or less self-conscious about his physicality. He was a slightly pudgy kid, for example (I know what that feels like), and I think the whole jacket thing was a holdover from that. My whole point about what he has been wearing recently is that he seems to have lost some inhibitions about his physical presence. That’s all. And I believe if you go back, you’ll see that this is very nearly precisely what I said.

I do appreciate more than anything that we can discuss these issues in a reasonable way. And I thank smanda from the bottom of my heart for her devotion, her principles, and her generosity in sharing them with us.

Freo,
David is wise to stay away. If he needs feedback on anything concerning his performances and career moves he should discuss them with his management.

Can I say something else? It upsets me when I see fans telling David what to record, how to dress, how to move, how to sing, even how to style his hair and basically, complaining a lot. Gosh. What the heck do we know? Many of us have confessed to having been away from music for many years. I’d rather trust David’s instincts as to where to go with his music and the professionals around him to help him make informed choices.

Kindredspirit, I am tempted to analyze the new shirt last night and wonder if he purposely covered himself up, but I also wonder if Sagittarius made a well-meaning point that it was a just a shirt in a certain style and there was no conscious meaning behind it. I think that I’m going to let the chips fall where they may and think that it was just a clothing choice of the night.

Thank you Rascal for helping and stating so beautifully how Smanda feels and has expressed herself. It really does take alot of guts to take a stand and really speak what is on your mind. Bravo! Bravo Smanda! Although everyone may not agree, we all do agree on one thing though, we love David!

# 115 Freofan, thanks, I really believe it was merely a clothing choice and nothing else. The show is an informal one and David is young, why would he tuck it in. It’s the “in thing” or “cool thing” nowadays for young guys not to tuck in. Am basing this observation on highschool uniforms where these guys just hate to tuck them in. Simple as that.

Hello everyone..remind me the next time I see David in concert, which may be very soon..to just say how very wonderful he is and how much I love him and let it go at that..I’m still winding down from Houston..where David was very wonderful and I loved him! G’nite all..and for David…

Dear Lord, Though we are unworthy to ask,
Please take Care Of David. Watch over him, Protect him from all harm. Cloak him with your love and give him the strength to endure all that is thrown in his path. Give David the courage and guidance to say no those who ask for more than he can reasonably give. Surround David with loving and supportive people who love him UNCONDITIONALLY as we, his ARCHANGELS do. SEPARATE DAVID FROM THOSE WHO HAVE AGENDAS OTHER THAN FOR HIS WELLBEING. Give him rest when he’s weary and fatigued. Give him the stamina to sustain his hectic pace. Give him assurance when he feels doubt. Give him joy when he feels sad. Cloak him always in your protective arms. Keep David healthy & strong as he fulfills his Destiny which was written in his Book of Life before he was born.
This, though we may be unworthy, humbly pray,
Amen.

Sweet dreams David, be safe & secure in our love always! Take care. You will always be numero uno in our eyes! Thank you for all you do and for just being you!
CONTIGO SIEMPRE CON AMOR!

So much to catch up on! But in the meantime [b]sable[/b] this was posted over at IDF:

[i]wow! this performance[/i] [of A Thousand Miles] [i]is getting so much attention:

~perez hilton site

~z100/ elvis duran -- posted under the morning show

~station in new orleans WEZB has 1000 miles up on their site front page -- http://www.b97.com/

Last I checked it had over 68,000 views on youtube! [/i]

This, on top of the video linked to above from E! Online, really is impressive given that this event was NOT TELEVISED. Yet still his performances are resonating and having a broader cultural impact, to some degree at least.

One of things on my David wishlist is for David to do a live Christmas concert on HBO or something, or any kind of concert that highlights his more transcendent, powerful music. Just him and THE VOICE. I’m thinking maybe something along the lines of Barbra’s first television specials, which were basically one-woman acts and simply her performing a variety of songs and styles. Basically, something that seriously highlights David’s artistry and makes him out to be the star and once-in-a-generation talent he truly is.

Freofan, yes I’ll be at the Albany show (which is on Wednesday).

Thank you rascal and others for the thoughtful and respectful discussion.

rascal, you asked why we have the need for objectification and then said, “it may be because David’s effect on us is so sublime that it needs, on occasion, to be grounded in some kind of base humanity (there is nothing wrong with the lower chakras)”

I laughed out loud in delighted agreement when I read that. I think there is a lot of truth there. Plus, as you said, “we simply love everything about him.”

Thank you rascal. Because of the strong bonds of trust that you have created with your commenters, this is a place where even difficult topics can be approached with clarity and grace.

Rascal111- thank you for your clarifying post, and just in the nick of time…..its getting crowded here in the hiding spot and we were panicked because we ran out of brownies several hours ago… Thanks again …. for everything…

happy LOL!!

Now this is how you have a discussion with divergent opinions and yet keep it respectful, but real.

Several months ago a discussion took place on another board about older women’s appreciation of David’s physical attritbutes. Much was said, but the implication was that it was somehow wrong. I totally disagreed of course.

There is nothing wrong with commenting on David’s beauty as it’s only another aspect of him as a human being. I’m also a bit miffed because I think that some of this stems from ageism as if once you are of a certain age you can only enjoy men of a certain age, in any way. And if we simply say that David is attractive that somehow we are perverts. That sucks.

I’ve never read anything here that would make me feel that David was being objectified or disrespected. I’ve been reading here for a long time now, and have never seen anything crossing the line. I have a child that age myself, and would be mortified if I thought I was partaking or even standing idly by while the sexual objectification of of child was taking place. Just don’t tell me I can’t say he’s purty. “Cause he is.

I will still say that I think he almost as much a joy to behold with my eyes, as to hear with my ears, and frankly don’t think that I am wrong to say it.

Rascal I just want to say that I love this site very much and thank you for all that you do for the love of David.
Everyone here has different opinions I’m sure, but I do agree with some as far as not seeing anything wrong with the way he dressed or performed in Sacramento or Houston.
As we all know…to make it in the music business…you have to be a good singer (unless your Brittany), performer, and just as important is an artist’s style…the way they dress. I do not see anything wrong with the way he dressed in Sacramento. He wore jeans, t-shirt, and a vest. He looked very good and it was age appropriate. If anyone has checked the styles lately…like I have…because I have two teenage boys…most of the jeans in the stores I have seen are form fitting, straight leg, or tapered leg. It is hard to find loose or baggy fitting jeans. The style now is the tight fitting jeans of the “80s”, as I call it. I was very happy to see him not wearing a jacket and feel that he crossed NO barriers in doing this. It is crucial that he appeal to the teenagers and 20 somethings in order to have good cd and concert sales. What he wore was VERY CONSERVATIVE COMPARED TO MOST of the other artists out there. I was so happy to see him performing well and dressing young and in style. I feel like he did not compromise any of his beliefs or morals…whatever they may be. He always remains respectful in his music as well as in what he wears…can’t say that about many others…alahhh…Brittany again lol sorry! Don’t mean to step on any toes here. Just expressing my opinion as others do.

Rascal -- In response to his A Thousand Miles performance being posted on various media sites…
I am glad that others are somewhat reconizing that when David is given great material he is A-M-A-Z-I-N-G!!

Oops!

“…….because as adults we have recognized the difference……”

“….a young person who is yet to discover….”

Haste always makes waste.

http://www.vh1.com/video/play.jhtml?id=1589356&vid=278040

#27 in the Top 100 music videos of 2008 on VH1

Ok Ok -- I very seldom comment but tonight I just have too, even though things seem a little calmer. Before I lose my train of thought, I don’t think ANY ONE HAS EVER BEEN DISRESPECTFUL towards David. We have loved him, worried about him, prayed for him, cried for him, listened to him, laughed with him, and on and on. If ever there was any kidding among the ladies it was mostly polking fun at OURSELVES, AT OUR OWN EXPENSE. You see I think David and everything about him brings out the younger woman (girl) in us. We know how we think and we dared to laugh at ourselves. I think the intellectual conversations are a breath of fresh air and I love reading all the blogs. I stay up late reading and laughing and just plain have a good time. Some of the things I read between the lines are halarious and I love laughing. Some things are so thought provoking that I am forced to do some soul searching to try to remember the good in “me.” Sometimes I go to bed and I do count my blessings because I know that I have been lucky in my life. No matter what the subject matter of the nights bloggs is though, I always go to bed thanking God that there is David , and for all that he is.

Now about Houston -- I was there, right in front. My feeling is that everything was rushed. The gates didn’t open on time so when David came out not everyone was in. Boy did those people miss out! Secondly, (I think David got a hair cut, by the way lol! ) I wish there would have been a little more time between the songs, just to get back to earth to listen to the next. Third, the clothes, well besides the Diva -- he was the best dressed just a little different than we have grown acustomed to lately. I think we need to lighten up and just love him and quit second guessing his every move. We know that there so much more to come but we need to be patient. We have the solos coming up and then watch what will happen!!! He won’t have to share the stage with anyone, not that , that matters -- but we’ll get MORE DAVID!!! The withdrawals won’t be so painful.

I love you SF cuz you love him so much.

Wow! What a night it has been here!

But before I comment on what transpired here, some great news 1st to add to ronaldsf’s post #123. HOUSTONRUFUS has this to report after the the Houston JB:

“I would say there were definitely some new converts. I think David got a great reception. He was the first one out, so some were still trickling in. But David had a lot of diehard fans there with signs, t shirts. That kind of surprised me. We heard several “non-fans” say great things.

JingleBall is indeed giving him good promotion. Cool eh?

smanda #87

This being a public blog, readers have the option to read or not. Suggesting what “code of decency” a public blog content consists of is over the line.
If you feel offended by comments regarding David that refer to his budding maturity. you may be best server to skip those particular posts.

If rascal had received complaints from the family, you can be sure there would be some “deleting” of posts. The blog would reduce to “swiss cheese”. Brett Hales reads here and posts on ND. Jeff Archuleta shows up rearely, but never has he publicly distained the tone of comments.

I speak for myself when I say this blog may be the most “honest” interpretation of David’s artistry. Rascal is a true fan. He comments on his blog from his heart. There is no doubt where his loyalty lies.

The fans come here to express what they feel about all aspects of the phenomenon that is David Archuleta. If some things are offensive to some readers, perhaps skipping those posts will cure whatever angst is causing the problem

I’m late to the party coz my little handicapped made a trip to the Emergency. But, I’m here now and think I will throw caution to the wind and blunder on into the debate raised by smanda.

I get where both sides are coming from. David is flat-out gorgeous. You’d have to be blind or dead to miss it, and I think occasional comments about his physicality are inevitable. If I wanted to make a list of what I find attractive in him, I would need a ream paper. I’m a completely over-the-top, totally smitten fan. (Never been a fan of anyone ever. New territory here.)

However, portions of one of the last threads were pretty tasteless, if you want my opinion. (I know, 90% of you don’t--but, oh well.)

Let’s try a thought experiment: Everyone involved who posts here swaps sexes, I wonder if the discussion would seem so cut and dried. Let’s say YOUR daughter, niece, granddaughter or young friend is 17 and a fabulous singer. She’s shy and as innocent as you could find. She gets an incredible break and is thrust into the public sphere. A fansite inhabited mainly by adult male professionals sometimes speculate about her luscious breasts and their size. And, her yummy private parts. That would be just fine with you?? Or not? This a 17 y/o innocent girl, one you know and love. Somehow, I doubt that the comments would be as easy to excuse.

I think it’s one thing to gush about David’s eyes, hair, hands, arms…and a whole other thing snickering about the size of his package. Ruler or yardstick? I think that’s what has caused bouts of revulsion in some of the posters here who otherwise love the site. Some people who were regulars have backed off coz they’re not comfortable with crossing the line there.

Maybe some of you would be fine snickering about some young girl’s boobs and private parts, but others of us would find it tacky, low rent behavior.

Excuse it any way you like. Talk around it, try to make those of us who have a smidge more propriety feel like Neandrathals. But, at the end of the day, David still does not deserve smarmy comments about his private parts even if cloaked in innuendo.

Correction: the crossing of the line here.

(Note to self: edit before posting. Duh.)

Chum FM -- David is on in minutes to perform live -- be sure to listen; people came from all over Canada (some days before) and the excitement is palpable even through audio!

Thanks Kizzi for that info!

I’ve rarely posted, cuz by the time I come online everyone has called it a night. Wow, did not see this one coming. Guess it was inevitable. Amongst all the qualities that David has brought to us is his beauty -- physical, as well as his inner beauty. As I’ve said previously but sure no one has ever seen my posts (except JR & beebee, once) for me David’s music (instrument/voice) affects me both spiritually & sensually. At first I was embarassed to think of it as sensual, as this felt somehow wrong -- having raised 3 sons & coached boys Davids age. Never before have I had these feelings. But I couldn’t explain it’s affect, otherwise. The chills, unexpected tears, emotional outbreaks/downers (like sf, after Houston JB, beebee after sacJB) that were also affecting me. I feel his music affects me spiritually & sensually because he puts so much emotional feeling into it. Unfortunately, sometimes sensual translates to sexual overtones. Since I’m not privy to such knowlege about human nature, I can only suppose why? Perhaps others are affected in this same way, too? Sorry, I can’t explain it for me but I do understand why what has been said (mostly in jest & not of David), at times. It did seem like some were put in “time out” and that felt wrong.

IMAGINE (realized this while listening to LA benefit). If we were like David & just accept people for what they are not judging them by what they say or do (ie -- that legal prostitute, Priscilla Presley and this)? After watching the Kathy Griffin interview, I realized that David is so true to his beliefs (not just the religious ones). When she asked him why he calls David Cook, “Cook” and he followed with his explanation. She responded something to the effect, that he (Cook) calls him not very nice things. His response was “oh, that’s too bad”. True or not, that so impressed me. I think he realizes that everyone has their differences -- good or bad. He just accepts them for who they are. Not sure but I would quess that he doesn’t take too much personally, either. Otherwise, he would be a total mess. I probably make no sense & no one will see this comment, anyway.

Also, I love this site for the diverse opinions; great info on album, record success, various links to photos & esp videos; tech help (ie -file2HD); personal experiences & so-oooo much more. Thank you Rascal & all ND family.

I always thought of David as that nerdy kid who sat behind me in school and annoyed the snot out of me…you know the kid who sang in the choir and wasn’t macho enough to play on the football team. My gosh, he’s shorter than me, too. And those chipmunk cheeks of his, and that overly big smile (who is he kidding).

Fast forward 10 years…reunion time. And there he is across the room from me. My heart jumps, my breathing gets rapid, my palms sweat, I tingle every where and he hasn’t even started to sing to us. Oh my! He still has chipmunk cheeks, he’s still shorter than me, he still doesn’t play football and that smile is still huge.

David hasn’t changed…just my perception of him.

RE: Bookaholic -- #149

See, this is what really galls me about certain stripes of puritanism. It happens all the time. In her effort to characterize the discussions here in terms of vulgarity, Bookaholic has in fact succeeded in posting one of the most explicit phrases I have ever seen on this site: “her luscious breasts and their size. And, her yummy private parts.” — Are you freaking kidding me? Have there ever been any comparable phrases posted here about anyone? I confess I don’t read every last comment in each and every thread but I think I would have noticed if anything as remotely tasteless as that had been used to describe the subject of this blog.

In all-too typical fashion, an attempt to condemn the behavior of others has been made using worse behavior than that which is being condemned.

As a whole, the “reverse argument” falls apart mainly because it implies that there is something sexist going on here, or that there is some kind of double standard that, suddenly and inexplicably, is actually the cultural opposite of what has always been the case. In fact, I would be astonished if an adult male dominated blog about a seventeen year-old female singer were anywhere near as respectful and careful about its appreciation of her physical attributes as we are here about David. Innuendo would be the exception, not the rule, and the kind of flagrant vulgarity that Bookaholic uses would be par for the course.

Please, people: Let’s not use occasional instances of wink-wink nudge-nudge commentary as a broad brush with which to paint an entire conversation or community. And try, if you can, not to use the very tools you are trying to prohibit to make your points. It pretty much discredits your entire argument.

So you’re a puritan if you don’t think discussion of an innocent young man’s package is acceptable? That’s what the world has come to? Where have I been? Seems a bit extreme to me.

What I am trying to throw a light on is the difference between relatively innocuous gushing about David’s physicality and lasciviousness camouflaged with innuendo. I did not do any broad brushing that I’m aware of. The reason I read here regularly and post often is because I like the people here, the quality and nature of the commentary. If I was appalled by what went on here, I wouldn’t be around.

My issue is that it isn’t cool in my opinion to stick our noses in David’s groin. Most of him I think it’s fine to comment on. I just am not into making lewd comments about innocent young minors no matter how gorgeous the person or how veiled the verbiage.

My point with bringing up the opposite sex comparison was to make people think. The majority of women would be uncomfortable with sexual innuendo about an innocent young girl they cared about. In some rare instances of late, veiled commentary about David’s private parts crossed the line and was seen as vulgar to some of us.

I thought I made it clear that it was a incident on a recent thread and even brought over a specific reference that I was uncomfortable with…no broad brush that I know of. To implicate that I am some controlling, smothering school marm when all I want is a bit more respect for David strikes me as overreaction.

When it gets really smarmy, I’m creeped out. David is extremely dear to me, and that kind of demeaning, though cloaked, lewdness brings out the mother bear in me. Sorry.

IMHO, I think that David would think the above referenced remark coming from his wife would be hilarious and completely acceptable. From adult female and male fans--strangers--not so much.

Um Rascal, do you take suggestions for new thread ideas? Perhaps we need a thread devoted entirely to the sensuality issue -- that way we can get it all out of our systems! LOL

Ha ha, nice try, FunnyGirl!

Being primarily a lurker (time and computer issues) I’m just going to hop on here and agree with Caseydog. I’m not taking any bait to get into uncomfortable discussions. I adore this site… I’m here every day like clockwork and I appreciate all the gems I see posted, along with some occasionally hilarious stuff. Bottom line is I will sort through what “works for me” and remain completely devoted to all that is David Archuleta.
btw who’s going to lowell, MA? I’m still working on NYC which would be a double bonus. My dear friend in LA gave me such wonderful details of the tree lighting and the time spent with David’s family. He was simply incredible. Of course he was.

#166 -That piano performance of “Crush” is OUTSTANDING. (I hope it isn’t getting lost in the shuffle.)

Logging on late due to…ah never mind, not important!

David singing CRUSH & playing the piano!! Scenes of the future..When David is past the “pop” stage and onto the “serious” stuff he obviously (to me anyway) wants to do..but maybe we won’t have to wait..maybe he’ll have a piano for his SOLO concerts..It’s a must! Oh I love watching him move about the stage, but he is sublime when he plays piano & sings! Yup, just David, THE VOICE, a piano, & a mic..oh yeah & his band!
Can I say David looks beautiful this morning in a black jacket & scarf! Stay warm, David!

I also watched all the better videos of David’s performance in Houston..Yeah, he was great! THE VOICE sounded effortless! He did a small “hunkerdown” that I must have missed?? How could I?? My eyes were glued to his every move, so how did I miss it? Oh yeah, it was when the girls in front of me jumped up & down, screaming! That was why! Dang it!

Bliss…oh Rascal how you have captured my feelings for David with the title of this blog. Let me preface my post here with a heartfelt thank you for all of the interesting and diverse opinions expressed here. There are many thought provoking topics that have made me stop and really analyze what my feelings are about certain subjects and where I stand, and that is a wonderful thing.

Now, can I share with you my feelings when I had the pleasure to see and hear the videos from the LA Tree Lighting. For the very first time since hearing David sing in SLC, I could “feel” the song on a video. The chills, tingles, and tears were instant with O Holy Night. A Thousand Miles…I can’t even describe what I am feeling at this gift from David. To witness his joyful exuberance when he is performing this song for me is like a little extra whipping cream on the pumpkin pie! Oh David, it will kill me if I never have the chance to experience you performing live again!

My husband doesn’t understand my feelings and devotion for David, and at times I think he feels like I am a little out there! He didn’t attend the concert with me, so he has not had the opportunity to hear David sing in person. I told him that he will never understand what I feel until he sees and hears this beautiful, beautiful young man sing in person. That voice resonates into the very core of my soul. All I could do when I experienced hearing David sing in person was to sit there in awe, probably looking like a crazed fool, with tears streaming down my face. Honestly, I was emotionally and physically overwhelmed and exhausted after his very short set on the AI tour. I am amazed that I felt that stirring in my soul again watching the videos from LA. Somehow, the videos from jwipe on YouTube captured the VOICE and wow…what a treat!

LuckyAngel- I feel the same as you do about David and love it when someone else can say it as beautifully as you and many others here do.

Just went over to Snarky Archies and saw the pics from the Pepsi Video at the florist shop. He is the sweetest thing and the pic in front of the first Loteria card- “ay ay mi corazon!!!” (The mexican bingo card that looks like a heart)
He has pierced my heart with his singing and just like the arrow on that Loteria card. I sigh and am blissfully happy right now.I

SF#173, Yeah, a hunkerdown! And I caught a Diva hand on WFM on the Houston video.

tawna21 -- Snarky’s has some of it in video; I didn’t hear the vocal warm up though -- I think it was before the videographer began recording!

sorry`~ then you will see menu of interviews… davids is the first one on top…..enjoy……..

djb..You know it takes several days to wind down and process the whole “Can’t buh-lieve I saw David” experience! It’s like I know it happened but it’s a little surreal, still. And It was OVER way too quickly!

Anyway, I wanted the “controversy” to subside. It took a lot of willpower not to post my thoughts..but a very wise lady ( thanks, Liz! ) gave me great advice, so I refrained. But I do have one thing to say..If I thought that this site which is lovingly dedicated to this wonderfully gifted young man who has brought so much joy to so many, and changed so many just by “being”, was ever disrespectful or disloyal to David in any way, I and I know many other posters here would have said ADIOS long ago.The bond we have here is all FOR LOVE OF DAVID.
Thank God for rascal’s notingdavid! This is our outlet, a much needed gathering place for fans like myself. I was at a loss as to how to express my gratitude to David for what he has done for me in my life, and finding ND opened that door for me,. it’s a vehicle where I can open up and rejoice with my fellow posters who feel the same about David. We simply love David unconditionally. If I thought that anything I say would hurt David, it would kill me. Like my own kids, he is very important in my life, even if he never knows it. And it’s made me a better mom, a better sister, a better person than I was before David.

So thank you David & rascal!

A Thousand Miles is up to approx. 90,000 views at YouTube. This proves to me that David, even though Jive thinks so, doesn’t need all of the studio devices to sing a song that will capture America’s intention. Someday I will find the CD in the store from David, just him, a piano and a guitar.

I don’t think there is any other young pop singer with the courage to sing a “religious” Christmas Carol at the end of a set at a pop concert, and then to do it Acapella. And to have radio stations play it…what are they thinking? The voice triumphs over cynicism.

More and more we are seeing the “real” David. The guy who wants nothing more than to bring music to the masses. He just LOVES singing live. It is his passion and his destiny. Aren’t we glad that we are here to watch and listen.

some peolple can be at times ostentatious…

others adopt the role of disciple…

bookaholic is neither…you have been deemed…vulgar

welcome to the ether

np1107, So sorry to hear that your lovely gesture felt compromised. But in the end, surely the most important part of that experience was that David was able to meet you, to talk with you, and to appreciate the love and beauty that went into your project for him. That part can’t be touched by anyone.

SF- I loved the vocal warm-up -- it made me smile BIG TIME! He does love Canada!

stenocruiser /190~ thanks for the vid. link..I did not know that was out there….too cute…just too cute….I have said it before David is a treat a day ..in some way, whether it be a song version, new photos, something he says in an interview etc….THAT was my treat for today…ArchuAdorable at its best….and Yes I KNOW he is almost 18 and not 5….he is still adorable and will be at 90 as far as I am concerned……that just made me smile…..